GMTV is the Good Morning Television show broadcast
on ITV daily from 6am to 9.25am. It is a magazine style
programme made up of Newshour, Today and LK Today,
with a special feature on Fridays entitled Entertainment
Today. The designers work in small teams and are not
specifically assigned to one particular strand or programme
on GMTV or GMTV2.
There is a constant need for graphics and the turnaround
of jobs is extremely fast. Jobs may vary in size
considerably from creating a map visual to accompany
a news item, to re-designing and re-branding a channel
ident.
|
|
|


|
Working to a brief
Newshour, Today and LK Today are quite good examples of starting
from a brief, it's changed to become slightly different on screen,
so we've just had pre-shot video. The Today titles look very different
from that now for various reasons. If it's a corporate ID or one
of the big flagship idents, the Newshour Today titles, Lorraine,
when you're dealing with those you just don't know where you're
coming from so those are the worst ones.
The Today titles we had to change quite quickly because it just
wasn't working. Visually that all stemmed... the way I set up the
job in the first place. I had the brief then I changed it for various
reasons half way through and we couldn't get it to work properly
on screen so we had to re-design it again.
Their actual brief was they wanted it looking like the inside
of a computer
Understanding the audience or user
The whole show is like a magazine, it's split into three main
sections, the News Hour, Today Programme which is the chat
show element, and the
Lorraine
Kelly
bit, which is very much aimed at housewives, so those three parts
of the show have very different identities. On Friday you've
got something
called
Entertainment
Today, it's showbiz gossip, so that has its own look and it has its
own sort of remit. The audience is always changing, so breaking
those down, Newshour used to be a lot more hard nosed, aimed
at predominantly men or business
people, business
women as well, getting up for work, so they'd be interested in that
news, and an hour later you've got the Today programme which is just
chit chat,
and that's
a very different audience, it's people who are still at home, maybe
working, maybe a bit younger, and you've got the Lorraine Kelly section
which
is really
aimed at housewives who are still at home, more often than not with
their children, so it's based a lot more around hair and make up
and a few
health problems.
So three different identities and you think well
they're probably easy enough to relate to in terms of graphics,
but when we come to
the Today
Programme,
anybody who's trying to do a re-design on that they don't know
what shots to do, they
don't know whether they want to have the presenters, they don't
really know what they're trying to say in the graphic. So that's
a big problem.
There's a really good example of
that in the Lorraine Kelly titles. For years they had the titles
and it was always Lorraine Kelly in
it and
this time
they wanted a new look. The brief on paper was they wanted `normal'
women, whether
women working, couples, just normal women, so we thought it might
be quite nice to go out and shoot women at work and at play, sort
of stylised
in
cafes, what
have you, just sort of close up, and then interleave that with
video shots of whatever might be coming up, whether it be stars
or fashion,
so those
titles went out for a little while, and we had a back drop of video,
a women related
video, business women, shopping, babies, I think there's a couple
of shots of
women as doctors and nurses, career women if you like, so that
was the backdrop and the foreground was stylised model shots of
women
getting ready, putting
make up on, business women on the phone.
But very quickly with their
ratings, the stories had changed so it wasn't really about the
career women and the harder nosed stories
which they'd
hoped, so
we had to do a re-design and they just didn't know how to package
the programme, so the senior editor said 'I see the Lorraine show
as like
a coffee break
at the end of the hubbub of the main show, let's do something with
coffee pots'.
You've basically got a background of a coffee pot and a sort of
stylised cup, interlaced with video footage of what might be coming
up, again
stars or health
or women related stories, and it was just such a weak way of putting
a job together.
Research techniques and methodologies
The Olympic Games one
just seemed to flow. Initially we weren't allowed to use the
Olympic rings 'cause it's a copyright logo
and we haven't
got the
licence for it, but all along I wanted to do something along
those lines. I think it
was the anniversary so it was in Atlanta, so it was a mixture
of olden day sand
if you like and a bit more high tech which came in the type
and I think we did about three or four different storyboards 'cause
it
kept getting
thrown
out,
how we could put the Olympic rings in. Then it was going to
be
sponsored by the British Olympic Federation and I'd done the
same thing with
the logo there,
then
it came back again and it was different logos that we could
have used. All the time it was going to be whatever I had, whatever
the logo was
I'd have
done the
same treatment, and when we were allowed to finally use the
rings
it just kept it together but that was all based on an idea
that was quite
strong
in the
first place, so it doesn't matter how they'd have changed it,
I'd have still come back
to that, so that's nice when an idea works.
Design methods
and practical development
I was doing the Today
titles and the News Hour titles back to back and on my storyboard
they were going to revolve round
a
globe with
a sort
of grid
system.
News Hour was going to be very much more hard line news
and the boxes were going to have VT images of the day's news
which would
come round
the globe.
I set about
to do that and we were just so back to back and I was learning
the equipment on that stage anyway, so got that one out,
then within the next 20 minutes
as soon as that was finished I started on the Today titles,
so they
said well that
works fine on its own without the editorial going in.
That
was another problem, they would have to decide editorially what
footage goes into that graphic, and the Today titles
were going to
be much the
same but a bit more morphing in the centre, a bit more
like an energised sun,
but still
with VT footage going round of the presenters. Then they
said well we don't really want the grid system because
it looks
too much
like the
Newshour,
so that was
thrown out of the window, so I went home and just did
a couple of effects and came up with something that looked
quite nice,
it was
a morphing
sun just expanding
and it starts to blob and the development of the sun
in the middle, but then there was no way of flying pictures
around
that because
it was a
background on its own. So we ended up putting those soft
little segments around the
screen, which we were updating quite often, but people
couldn't see what they were
and
there weren't enough shots, they didn't know how to package
the show.
The Today programme, which is the flagship
programme, which is the sofa chat with Eamon Holmes and Fiona
Phillips, it's sort
of current
affairs
and it
just goes hand in hand with newspaper stories so it's
quite
up to date, and initally
they're saying well let's make this programme an element
of what's going on all around Britain, so let's have
views of
places around
Britain, Stonehenge or Angel
of the North, which you'll see in the shots, but then
they became completely irrelevant, then spring time
would come
and you go
what do you show
for
that? Oh some flowers and some lambs and it just became
more and more irrelevant, 'cause all along they didn't
want the
presenters in it,
then they said
well
let's try
and put it with the presenters and that didn't work
because it wasn't designed to do that, so we just knocked it
on the head
and
I re-designed
it, so
one could have worked without footage, the one with
footage in News Hour, which
should
have had footage didn't, and the Today titles which
shouldn't have had footage we tried to put footage in so that was
an example of
a success
and something
not working there.
Creation and construction
I was doing a redesign for
the ident, and I wanted to bring in a lot more of what print
was doing at
the time,
a lot
of white
space,
changing
our
colours slightly, which was the old traditional
very dark blue and the gold. It did
look very clean but at the end of the day it was
the wrong colours, they thought
it
was too cold and I had to convince them that you
can still have whites and blues and still make
it look
warm. I just
made mood
boards which
are just
cut out from
magazines, shapes, colours, with absolutely nothing
to do with our content, so straight away when they
looked
at that
they
could get
a feel.
It's actually one of the projects that didn't
work out very well. It was the ident but we were trying
to sell
it on the
gold and
the light
blue
and quite
a bit of white coming in. I'd shot quite a lot
of stuff on the camera, which I was desperately
trying
to make
work and
we got
the background
ok and we
got the gold animating really nicely, we just
couldn't bring up the letters GMTV.
I had a go, somebody else had a go, it went to
a 3D designer outside, came back, still wasn't
right
and
I finally
nailed it on the head
and it worked
ok, but
then they were saying that the background was
too blue, let's bring some colour in, which we tried
to do. They
re-designed
it some
time later
and the typeface,
which I quite liked, which you see on the reel,
was a variation on what we were using on GMTV2,
but the
Chief
Editor just
considered it a kiddie
typeface,
wanted
the whole thing rounder and bubblier. I purposely
made the yellow orb as a disc as opposed to a
ball, but
they wanted
to bring
it back
to
the ball.
Presenting and gathering feedback
Once
we've put the final logo on and it's finally to tape, that is our
signing off really.
Once
they've got it, that's
it for
us. You
get a
few producers,
like the senior producers who don't really
want to come down, so you might have to
put elements onto tape throughout the project.
(This text is taken from main presentation material). |